OnThePunt Home


Aussie Rules
Basketball NBA
Basketball NBL
Boxing
Cricket
Formula One
Golf
Horse Racing
Rugby League
Rugby Union
Soccer
Tennis
US Football

Click Here

canbet.com


FROM BETFAIR

Media Release
Posted 9:15 PM, April 28, 2004

 

TAB publishes further false statement

Press release was issued at 0000 GMT, 28 April 2004

TAB Limited continues to offend and deceive as its campaign to see Betfair banned from operating in Australia continues. Its subtle shift from attacking ‘internet betting exchanges’ to ‘foreign internet betting exchanges’ also serves to reveal its real agenda: anything works, so long as we can run it.

Alleging that race-fixing has increased since betting exchanges were developed is the same as saying that speeding on roads is more prevalent since speed cameras were introduced, by virtue of the fact that the detection rate of speeding cars is now higher. It is naïve, if not ignorant.

Betting exchanges provide maximum transparency in sports and horserace betting. Where corruption exists – and history suggests strongly that it has long existed wherever money and sport mix – it is more likely to be unearthed thanks to betting exchanges than it is through any other wagering platform.

On an exchange, every transaction is logged, and is traceable to an end user. Every detail of every bet is recorded and kept indefinitely. You cannot seek to profit on a betting exchange through rigging a race without leaving indelible fingerprints.

This is why a committee of British MPs and peers recently reported to the UK government that “the audit trail produced by betting exchanges is far superior to that produced by ordinary bookmakers, as acknowledged by the Chief Executive of the Association of British Bookmakers.”

Betfair’s Memorandum of Understanding with sporting bodies allows it to give them full access to this unprecedented betting information. That Memorandum is available today, without any strings attached, to Australian racing, as it has been since the first day of Betfair’s operation in Australia.

Alleged corruption in horseracing is not a betting exchange issue. If it exists, it is a racing issue. It is not one to which exchanges bring new problems, but it is one to which they bring powerful solutions. In seeking to deflect attention away from the exchange model as a whole to foreign exchanges in particular, TAB acknowledges this fact. It is time for it also to acknowledge, as the well-known bookmaker Victor Chandler already has, that “the only problem with betting exchanges is that I didn’t think of them first”.

Ends

Notes to Editors:

1. TAB’s advert ‘UK exports race-fixing to Australia?’ is the fourth in a series being run in the Australian and the Australian Financial Review. It is part of a campaign to persuade the Federal Government to ban betting exchanges, which threaten the monopoly status of the TAB.

2. The Joint Scrutiny Committee delivered its report on the UK government’s draft Gambling Bill on 7th April 2004.

3. The Memorandum of Understanding signed with the UK Jockey Club, as well as with the ICC, the ATP, the FA, and other significant sporting bodies, is legally required before Betfair can give up information about its clients’ behaviour, under the terms of the UK’s Data Protection Act and Australia’s Privacy Act. Once signed with any sporting body, it brings into play a waiver signed by all of Betfair’s clients, and allows information to be passed. Betfair has repeatedly offered this facility to Australian racing authorities, making clear that signing it does not in any way constitute an endorsement of Betfair, nor tie either party to any form of commercial agreement. It is purely and simply a tool to help the fight against corruption.


TAB hypocrisy continues

Press release issued at 2.00am GMT, Wednesday 21st April 2004

The second in the series of TAB’s press advertisements against betting exchanges, published today, reveals further the hypocrisy of TAB Ltd.

TAB claims that problem gambling is set to explode. TAB’s real concern is that it will lose its monopoly on the wagering market, as some of its business is displaced to a more competitive operator which offers consumers what they want. TAB’s argument, as detailed below, is as fallacious as its agenda is transparent.

Betfair is approaching the fourth anniversary of its launch in the United Kingdom. There is no evidence whatsoever, nor has there been any suggestion, that it has increased problem gambling in that time. What it has done is offer consumers choice, value, and control.

Betfair does not believe it is the answer for all punters, but it does believe that consumers deserve choice and a fair go. TAB aims deny them both. It would have people believe that it seeks to limit wagering opportunities in order to achieve that aim.

Notes:

1. TAB first raised the issue of problem gambling after it became apparent that its arguments against Betfair from a funding standpoint were falling on deaf ears. Previously, it had claimed that Betfair could not provide tax and racing revenues to match its own, owing to its business model. Subsequently, it claimed that a high-turnover, low-margin model could of course hit the targets, but only by resulting in a substantial increase in turnover.

2. TAB’s turnover argument is, in any case, erroneous, and demonstrates a complete lack of knowledge and/or understanding of the exchange model. A punter who takes $100 from an ATM can only turn over $100 on TAB. He can, however, turn over an unlimited amount of money on an exchange, providing that each new bet keeps his total exposure under $100. For example, a punter who backs a horse at 10/1 can lay that bet off at 5/1. This reduces his exposure to zero, and guarantees him a profit – while doubling his turnover.

3. In 2003, Betfair received the Queen’s Award for Enterprise in the Innovation category. Betfair uses technology to support the three key pillars on which gambling legislation in Britain are based. These are protecting the vulnerable, keeping crime out of sport, and ensuring fairness to the punter.

4. In marked contrast to TAB’s suggestions, Betfair is breaking new ground for wagering organisations in dealing with problem gambling. Betfair works closely with GamCare, the UK’s leading problem gambling charity, to lead that drive.


TAB reveals clear ignorance of exchanges

Press release issued at 2.35am GMT, 23rd April 2004

TAB Limited’s third advert attacking betting exchanges, of which Betfair is the 90% market player, reveals the extent to which the organisation fails completely to understand what exchanges are all about.

TAB wishes to insinuate that by allowing their customers some control and ability to manage their risk, betting exchanges allow ordinary members of the public to act as bookmakers, with all the regulatory risks that would entail.

This is patent nonsense. Punters use betting exchanges in exactly the same way as any other bookmaker: they submit a request for a bet on a particular event to Betfair, hand over their stake to Betfair and if they win, come back to collect their winnings from Betfair. They have no interaction with any other punters, no opportunity for handling other customers’ funds and no opportunity for selecting who is on the other side of their bet.

In short, betting exchange customers are just ordinary punters, and should not be characterised as bookmakers. They do not deal with the public, handle any money other than their own, or have any control over either the takeout or any price other than the one they submit themselves as a request to Betfair. They do not ‘take bets’ as suggested in the TAB press release which was also published today. They simply bet, with Betfair, on outcomes only of events which have a published result, with the opportunity to bet that a given outcome will or will not happen. If they do not like the prices or service offered by Betfair, they can do exactly the same thing, albeit it less efficiently, at the TAB.


TAB’s accompanying press release quotes Tim Ryan, Chief Executive of the Australian Bookmakers Association, as saying that bookmakers do not bet on teams or horses to lose. This is patently false, since they offer prices against horses and teams winning.

He also claims that the risk of money laundering, crime, and race fixing are all increased by betting exchanges, when there is no evidence to support these statements whatsoever. They are just irresponsible scare-mongering driven by a commercial agenda rather than by any genuine concern about these regulatory issues.

Betfair is entirely comfortable, following a meeting with Austrac, Australia’s anti-money laundering regulator, that its systems compare extremely well with wagering operators in Australia in dealing with money-laundering risks. Its audit trail is far more transparent than any existing operation, and therefore makes any improper dealings far easier to recognise than is currently the case with TAB. And high-profile representatives of the Australian racing industry are among the many who believe that allegations regarding race-fixing are unsubstantiated and without merit.

Mr. Ryan’s thinking would appear to be muddled in more than one area. His current opposition to the exchange model stands in marked contrast to his initial commercial interest. On 30th September 2002, he wrote to Betfair saying:

“I would appreciate someone from Betfair's corporate area contacting me with respect to establishing a Betfair white-label site/s (like smartbet or drhobets). I currently own the 'exchange' domains bookie.com.au, twoflies.com (as in betting on two flies crawling up a wall), twoflies.com.au, 2flies.com.au, ibetyou.com, ibetyou.com.au, ibetu.com.au, livesports.com.au, livesport.com.au.”

 

APRIL 2004 ARTICLES

Media Release Betfair 21:15 28/04/40
Media Release TAB Sportsbet 21:00 28/04/04
Centrebet Capers Centrebet 19:00 22/04/04
Centrebet Capers Centrebet 16:15 16/04/04
Media Release TAB Sportsbet 23:00 13/04/04
Centrebet Capers Centrebet 16:15 08/04/04
Press Release Multibet 16:00 08/04/04
Weekend Preview Sportingbet 17:45 07/04/04
Centrebet Capers Centrebet 18:00 01/04/04

ARCHIVES

MARCH 04 ARCHIVE  
JANUARY 04 ARCHIVE FEBRUARY 04 ARCHIVE
NOVEMBER 03 ARCHIVE DECEMBER 03 ARCHIVE
SEPTEMBER 03 ARCHIVE OCTOBER 03 ARCHIVE
JULY 03 ARCHIVE AUGUST 03 ARCHIVE
MAY 03 ARCHIVE JUNE 03 ARCHIVE
MARCH 03 ARCHIVE APRIL 03 ARCHIVE
JANUARY 03 ARCHIVE FEBRUARY 03 ARCHIVE
NOVEMBER 02 ARCHIVE DECEMBER 02 ARCHIVE
SEPTEMBER 02 ARCHIVE OCTOBER 02 ARCHIVE
JULY 02 ARCHIVE AUGUST 02 ARCHIVE
JUNE 02 ARCHIVE MAY 02 ARCHIVE
APRIL 02 ARCHIVE MARCH 02 ARCHIVE
FEBRUARY 02 ARCHIVE JANUARY 02 ARCHIVE


© 2003 OnThePunt.com.au - All rights reserved